Respected judge’s view on discovery is dangerous and wrong December 8, 2018
A highly respected judge serving on the Third Circuit Circuit Court of Appeals recently told the crowd at the 2018 Federalist Society Convention: “If I were able to do something unilaterally, I would probably institute a new federal rule that said that all cases worth less than $500,000 will be tried without any discovery.” The audience applauded. A fellow panelist, Judge Amul Thapar of the 6th Circuit, chimed in, “Can I say amen?”
These judges are wrong. Their views on discovery, if sincerely held, are dangerous. Congress chose private parties – acting as private attorneys general – to enforce the laws requiring employers to pay what they owe and to treat people equally at work. Congress enacted fee-shifting rules to ensure lawyers would accept and litigate “small” cases – cases where the economic losses are less than $500,000 – because the social policies behind the laws are so important. Many economists would also argue that a $500,000 case to someone making $50,000 a year is much more important than a $50 Million case to Comcast, Apple, Amazon or GE.
When a case begins, the employer controls the witnesses, the documents, the emails, everything. Denying discovery would make cases that are already difficult on a good day impossible to win. No lawyer would agree to represent an individual in a civil rights case if the lawyer could not request documents from the employer or take depositions.
Any rule denying discovery in cases “worth” less than $500,000 would blow a hole through some of the most important federal laws ever written, deny justice to millions of working Americans, and make America less fair and less equal.
1705 GULF TOWER
PITTSBURGH, PA 15219
412-258-2250 | OFFICE DIRECT